RAS PhysicsРадиотехника и электроника Journal of Communications Technology and Electronics

  • ISSN (Print) 0033-8494
  • ISSN (Online) 3034-5901

Investigation of efficiency of DoA algorithm on the base of experimental data and numerical simulations in automotive distributed system of incoherent radars

PII
10.31857/S0033849424040079-1
DOI
10.31857/S0033849424040079
Publication type
Article
Status
Published
Authors
Volume/ Edition
Volume 69 / Issue number 4
Pages
357-363
Abstract
Investigation of efficiency of proposed DoA estimation algorithm for system of distributed incoherent automotive radars is performed on the base of experimental data and numerical simulation. It is shown that the proposed algorithm correctly recognizes the position of targets in considered experimental scenarios. Comparative numerical simulations show the efficiency of the proposed algorithm compared to the characteristics of single radar.
Keywords
система распределенных некогерентных автомобильных радаров система помощи водителю алгоритм сверхразрешения близких целей метод Кейпона автокомпенсатор
Date of publication
16.09.2025
Year of publication
2025
Number of purchasers
0
Views
14

References

  1. 1. Gottinger M., Hoffmann M., Christmann M. et. al. // IEEE J. Microwaves. 2021. V. 1. № 1. P. 149. https://doi.org/10.1109/JMW.2020.3034475
  2. 2. Waldschmidt C., Hasch J., Menzel W. // IEEE J. Microwaves. 2021. V. 1. P. 135. https://doi.org/10.1109/JMW.2020.3033616
  3. 3. Черняк В.С. Многопозиционная радиолокация. М.: Радио и связь, 1993.
  4. 4. Patole S., Torlak M., Wang D., Ali M. // IEEE Signal Process. Mag. 2017. V. 34. № 2. P. 22. https://doi.org/10.1109/MSP.2016.2628914
  5. 5. Ziegler J., Bender Ph., Schreiber M. et al. // IEEE Intell. Transp. Syst. Mag. 2014. V. 6. № 2. P. 8. https://doi.org/10.1109/MITS.2014.2 306552
  6. 6. Deng H. // IEEE Aerosp. Electron. Syst. Mag. 2012. V. 27. № 5. P. 28. https://doi.org/10.1109/MAES.2012.6226692
  7. 7. Bialer O., Jonas A., Tirer T. // IEEE Sensors J. 2021. V. 21. № 16. P. 17846. https://doi.org/10.1109/JSEN.2021.3085677
  8. 8. Folster F., Rohling H., Lubbert U. // IEEE Int. Radar Conf. 2005. P. 871. https://doi.org/10.1109/RADAR.2005.1435950
  9. 9. Bialer O., Kolpinizki S. // IEEE Int. Conf. on Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing. 2019. P. 4175. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICASSP.2019.8682458
  10. 10. Артюхин И.В., Аверин И.М., Флаксман А.Г., Рубцов А.Е. // Журн. радиоэлектроники. 2023. № 4. https://doi.org/10.30898/16841719.2023.4.2
  11. 11. Артюхин И.В., Аверин И.М., Флаксман А.Г., Рубцов А.Е. // IX Int. Conf. “Engineering & Telecommunication En&T-2022”. М.: МФТИ. 2022. С. 5.
  12. 12. Widrow B., Stearn S.D. Adaptive Signal Processing. Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, 1985.
  13. 13. Tuncer T.E., Friedlander B. Classical and Modern Direction-of-Arrival Estimation. Burlington; MA: Acad. Press, Inc. 2009.
  14. 14. Li J., Stoica P. MIMO Radar Signal Processing. Hoboken; N.J.: Wiley-IEEE Press, 2009.
  15. 15. Patole S., Torlak M., Wang D., Ali M. // IEEE Signal Processing Magazine. 2017. V. 34. № 2. P. 22. https://doi.org/10.1109/MSP.2016.2628914
QR
Translate

Индексирование

Scopus

Scopus

Scopus

Crossref

Scopus

Higher Attestation Commission

At the Ministry of Education and Science of the Russian Federation

Scopus

Scientific Electronic Library